Prototyping allows the users to try out a working model of a system before the actual system is complete. Explain how prototyping can be counterproductive if it creates task interference during training.
Prototyping is an activity during certain software development, it is the creation of prototypes, incomplete versions of the software program being developed. A prototype typically simulates only a few aspects of the features of the eventual program, and may be completely different from the eventual implementation.
The conventional purpose of a prototype is to allow users of the software to evaluate developers' proposals for the design of the eventual product by actually trying them out, rather than having to interpret and evaluate the design based on descriptions.
Prototyping has several reimbursements: The software designer and implementer can obtain response from the users early in the project. The client and the contractor can compare if the software completed matches the software specification, according to which the software program is built. It also allows the software engineer some imminent into the accuracy of preliminary project estimates and whether the deadlines and milestones proposed can be successfully met.
But even prototyping can have more advantages it is also and can produce counterproductive as you go along revising your prototypes because of some new idea that comes your way as you progresses in your project it can build counterproductive during the training task since you are editing it every now and then maybe you lack some polishing it before presenting it to others. It would be a big problem in your part since it interfere while you are there presenting it. Others may say that you make projects that are not efficient and liable. But because it was just a prototypes you can revised it anytime you want.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Activity5a_SE1
If one person has written a component but others have revised it, who is responsible if the component fails? What are the legal and ethical implications of reusing someone else's component?
Revising means checking a piece of writing for grammar and mechanics. This kind of checking is better called proofreading. True revising involves making much more substantial changes in a piece of writing. In altering one’s work will now matter if the person who revised it has all the acquiescence in doing it so and the owner knows what that persons (who will revised his/her work) thought in revising it.
In the first place, there are levels of revising ones work. First is at its most extreme, revising means discarding a draft and starting over. In this extreme of revising, the writer rethinks the writing, changing content as well as organization and style. At this level of revising, the writer is concerned with the basic content, the concepts and fundamental imagery of the writing. Second would be a less extreme form of revising means reorganizing the draft and adding or removing sections of it. Revising at this level, the writer seeks to clarify content and style and to make the writing more accessible to the reader. At this level of revising, the writer is concerned with the overall structure of the writing, making it express the basic concept of the writing. While the third level of revising is close to proofreading. At this level, the writer mainly checks sentence and paragraph style, not so much looking for errors as seeking clear and effective writing. At this level, the writer is largely concerned with the rhythm of the writing.
In this level of revising, the individual who will revise ones toil should be educated of how to revise ones effort to avoid failures. The one revising should also continue the main point of the unusual writer of a definite subject matter and not just messing around or messing ones exertion.
Reusing is the ability to use all or the greater part of the same programming code or system design in another application. With this definition alone in no doubt we can instill into our minds how to reprocess one’s toil. You can revise it or even reuse it but never engrave the main idea of the item or one component. You can convey it in your own idea but never snatch one’s idea in it.
The legal and ethical implications of reusing else’s component is first to have a authorization from the original writer of that article. If it’s an online article and can be edited then you should have all those necessities needed in doing it so before publishing it. Secondly, you as the person revising ones theme you should be legally responsible in what you are doing and tying to imply. Liability when it comes to your capacity, knowledge and resources. It is very essential to take on consideration these things to foil failures.
Revising means checking a piece of writing for grammar and mechanics. This kind of checking is better called proofreading. True revising involves making much more substantial changes in a piece of writing. In altering one’s work will now matter if the person who revised it has all the acquiescence in doing it so and the owner knows what that persons (who will revised his/her work) thought in revising it.
In the first place, there are levels of revising ones work. First is at its most extreme, revising means discarding a draft and starting over. In this extreme of revising, the writer rethinks the writing, changing content as well as organization and style. At this level of revising, the writer is concerned with the basic content, the concepts and fundamental imagery of the writing. Second would be a less extreme form of revising means reorganizing the draft and adding or removing sections of it. Revising at this level, the writer seeks to clarify content and style and to make the writing more accessible to the reader. At this level of revising, the writer is concerned with the overall structure of the writing, making it express the basic concept of the writing. While the third level of revising is close to proofreading. At this level, the writer mainly checks sentence and paragraph style, not so much looking for errors as seeking clear and effective writing. At this level, the writer is largely concerned with the rhythm of the writing.
In this level of revising, the individual who will revise ones toil should be educated of how to revise ones effort to avoid failures. The one revising should also continue the main point of the unusual writer of a definite subject matter and not just messing around or messing ones exertion.
Reusing is the ability to use all or the greater part of the same programming code or system design in another application. With this definition alone in no doubt we can instill into our minds how to reprocess one’s toil. You can revise it or even reuse it but never engrave the main idea of the item or one component. You can convey it in your own idea but never snatch one’s idea in it.
The legal and ethical implications of reusing else’s component is first to have a authorization from the original writer of that article. If it’s an online article and can be edited then you should have all those necessities needed in doing it so before publishing it. Secondly, you as the person revising ones theme you should be legally responsible in what you are doing and tying to imply. Liability when it comes to your capacity, knowledge and resources. It is very essential to take on consideration these things to foil failures.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)