Activity5a_SE1

If one person has written a component but others have revised it, who is responsible if the component fails? What are the legal and ethical implications of reusing someone else's component?

Revising means checking a piece of writing for grammar and mechanics. This kind of checking is better called proofreading. True revising involves making much more substantial changes in a piece of writing. In altering one’s work will now matter if the person who revised it has all the acquiescence in doing it so and the owner knows what that persons (who will revised his/her work) thought in revising it.
In the first place, there are levels of revising ones work. First is at its most extreme, revising means discarding a draft and starting over. In this extreme of revising, the writer rethinks the writing, changing content as well as organization and style. At this level of revising, the writer is concerned with the basic content, the concepts and fundamental imagery of the writing. Second would be a less extreme form of revising means reorganizing the draft and adding or removing sections of it. Revising at this level, the writer seeks to clarify content and style and to make the writing more accessible to the reader. At this level of revising, the writer is concerned with the overall structure of the writing, making it express the basic concept of the writing. While the third level of revising is close to proofreading. At this level, the writer mainly checks sentence and paragraph style, not so much looking for errors as seeking clear and effective writing. At this level, the writer is largely concerned with the rhythm of the writing.
In this level of revising, the individual who will revise ones toil should be educated of how to revise ones effort to avoid failures. The one revising should also continue the main point of the unusual writer of a definite subject matter and not just messing around or messing ones exertion.
Reusing is the ability to use all or the greater part of the same programming code or system design in another application. With this definition alone in no doubt we can instill into our minds how to reprocess one’s toil. You can revise it or even reuse it but never engrave the main idea of the item or one component. You can convey it in your own idea but never snatch one’s idea in it.
The legal and ethical implications of reusing else’s component is first to have a authorization from the original writer of that article. If it’s an online article and can be edited then you should have all those necessities needed in doing it so before publishing it. Secondly, you as the person revising ones theme you should be legally responsible in what you are doing and tying to imply. Liability when it comes to your capacity, knowledge and resources. It is very essential to take on consideration these things to foil failures.